A federal district court in Washington State recently denied a claim for a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit aimed at halting a special-purpose credit program designed to address racial disparities in homeownership rates.
The Lawsuit and Denial of Injunction
The nonprofit advocacy group Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR) filed suit against the Washington State Housing Finance Commission in late 2024. FAIR challenged the state’s covenant homeownership program, arguing that it was unconstitutional and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Justice John Chun ruled in favor of the state by denying the motion for an injunction, citing prior Supreme Court decisions that recognized remediation of past discrimination as a compelling interest. The judge emphasized the historical discriminatory practices in Washington State that had hindered minority homeownership, justifying the need for the program.
The court also highlighted the stark statistical evidence of discrimination, further supporting the state’s position.
FAIR’s Arguments and Criticisms
FAIR contended that injunctive relief was necessary to prevent further erosion of rights and claimed that the program would cause irreparable harm. However, the court found FAIR’s arguments lacking in specifics, noting that FAIR did not demonstrate that any specific individual had been denied access to the program based on their race.
Despite the denial of the injunction, FAIR expressed its intention to continue pursuing its legal case. FAIR’s executive director, Monica Harris, criticized the court’s reliance on the state’s disparity study to justify race-based eligibility, emphasizing the need for a more tailored approach to meet constitutional requirements.
Special-Purpose Credit Programs and Recent Changes
Special-purpose credit programs (SPCPs) have been in existence since the 1970s but have gained prominence in recent years as a means to provide lending products and community investment for disadvantaged groups. The Washington State SPCP offers downpayment and closing cost assistance to eligible borrowers, aiming to facilitate first-time homeownership for individuals facing financial barriers.
However, the landscape of SPCPs has faced challenges, particularly with the Trump administration’s ban on such programs offered by government-sponsored enterprises like Freddie Mac. Federal efforts to roll back fair lending and diversity initiatives have further complicated the implementation of SPCPs.
Impact on Fair Housing and DEI Efforts
The Washington State court ruling reflects broader trends in the rollback of government measures supporting fair lending and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. Recent repeals and layoffs within federal agencies have signaled a shift away from policies deemed “woke” by the current administration.
Despite these challenges, organizations like Fannie Mae and nonfederal housing entities continue to navigate the evolving landscape of fair housing and DEI initiatives, adapting their strategies to align with changing regulatory environments.
Overall, the denial of the preliminary injunction in Washington State underscores the complexities surrounding racial equity in housing and the ongoing legal battles to address systemic disparities.
Sources: Click here
